Dreamstime photo |
Examples.
The Clinton Foundation. Bill was asked if he thought that accepting huge donations to the Foundation from questionable sources during Hillary's term as Secretary of State was a conflict of interest. He absolutely denied it. There was no favoritism. And the money was used for great causes.
Harvard says "Nuts Make you Live Longer" Great news! And maybe it's true. But the research was partly funded by an organization that represents nine nut tree nut industries.
There are examples of politicians accepting campaign funds while on industry specific committees and websites that promote consumer reporting while accepting advertising from the businesses reviewed. Look for yourself. It's rampant.
Legal? Probably. Ethical? Maybe. Moral? I'll let you answer that.
I personally think in simple terms. If an appearance of a conflict of interest exists, the conflict of interest exists. When found, circumstances can be adjusted to eliminate this perception before any impropriety occurs.
So maybe that's the question to begin with. Maybe conflict of interest becomes a warning sign to be acted upon so that corruption is avoided. My right/wrong definition is erroneous. Perhaps conflict of interest isn't the bad thing, perhaps it's an alarm-bell-ringing good thing.
I plan to monitor myself closely in this regard. I will try to follow Paul's advice.
Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests, but each of you to the interests of others. Philippians 2:3,4
If I can do that, I won't have to worry about the semantics of the term.
No comments:
Post a Comment